Missguided accused of ‘misleading’ suppliers on progress of business

Missguided
FashionEcommerce
// Missguided accused of misleading creditors after stating that its business made “substantial operational progress”
// An angry supplier said it was misled by company executives, which assured the company that the retailer had no debts

Missguided has misled creditors, including out-of-pocket suppliers, after stating that the business had made “substantial operational progress” earlier this year, according to one angry manufacturer.

Missguided chair Ian Gray said on 20 April that “Missguided has made substantial operational progress since receiving new investment at the end of 2021, placing us on a sounder footing in a very short space of time”.

He added that Missguided was “now in a position to accelerate plans to explore strategic options for the business”.

The director of family-run suppliers producing garments for men, ladies, and children, told Retail Gazette that he was also told in a meeting with Missguided sourcing director Nicola Gray in late April that the company had no debts.

The supplier said: “They did not try to stop or reduce their exposure with trade creditors and kept ordering more goods and asked us to get more goods shipped.”


READ MORE: What’s next for Missguided under Frasers Group?


The supplier said Missguided tried to take deliveries of goods on 11 May when a winding up petition was issued on the same day.

He also said that the company had not been paid by Missguided, despite goods continuing to be sold, even when Missguided was in adminstration.

Teneo was appointed around 20 April to help sell the business but was appointed as administrator last week.

Alteri declined to comment and Teneo did not respond to request to comment.

Mike Ashley’s Frasers Group snapped up Missguided out of administration last Wednesday for £20million.

Click here to sign up to Retail Gazette‘s free daily email newsletter

FashionEcommerce

1 Comment. Leave new

  • Jenny Stephenson 3 years ago

    My daughter never received her order which she was assured she would. Nor has she ever received a refund from Missguided & I quote their own assurance which was a downright lie!! (All items which were ordered through the UK website/ App prior to 13.11 on 30 May 2022 but which have not yet been delivered will continue to be processed. We are working hard with our stakeholders to meet these orders. Kindly allow longer to confirm the dates of delivery.)
    This was never honoured. Young girls save up & Missguided duped them. Perhaps the company should be re-named Misled! How can they be allowed to continue trading under the same name is beyond me.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.

FashionEcommerce

Share:

Missguided accused of ‘misleading’ suppliers on progress of business

Missguided

Social


SUBSCRIBE TO OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
// Missguided accused of misleading creditors after stating that its business made “substantial operational progress”
// An angry supplier said it was misled by company executives, which assured the company that the retailer had no debts

Missguided has misled creditors, including out-of-pocket suppliers, after stating that the business had made “substantial operational progress” earlier this year, according to one angry manufacturer.

Missguided chair Ian Gray said on 20 April that “Missguided has made substantial operational progress since receiving new investment at the end of 2021, placing us on a sounder footing in a very short space of time”.

He added that Missguided was “now in a position to accelerate plans to explore strategic options for the business”.

The director of family-run suppliers producing garments for men, ladies, and children, told Retail Gazette that he was also told in a meeting with Missguided sourcing director Nicola Gray in late April that the company had no debts.

The supplier said: “They did not try to stop or reduce their exposure with trade creditors and kept ordering more goods and asked us to get more goods shipped.”


READ MORE: What’s next for Missguided under Frasers Group?


The supplier said Missguided tried to take deliveries of goods on 11 May when a winding up petition was issued on the same day.

He also said that the company had not been paid by Missguided, despite goods continuing to be sold, even when Missguided was in adminstration.

Teneo was appointed around 20 April to help sell the business but was appointed as administrator last week.

Alteri declined to comment and Teneo did not respond to request to comment.

Mike Ashley’s Frasers Group snapped up Missguided out of administration last Wednesday for £20million.

Click here to sign up to Retail Gazette‘s free daily email newsletter

FashionEcommerce

1 Comment. Leave new

  • Jenny Stephenson 3 years ago

    My daughter never received her order which she was assured she would. Nor has she ever received a refund from Missguided & I quote their own assurance which was a downright lie!! (All items which were ordered through the UK website/ App prior to 13.11 on 30 May 2022 but which have not yet been delivered will continue to be processed. We are working hard with our stakeholders to meet these orders. Kindly allow longer to confirm the dates of delivery.)
    This was never honoured. Young girls save up & Missguided duped them. Perhaps the company should be re-named Misled! How can they be allowed to continue trading under the same name is beyond me.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.

RELATED STORIES

Latest Feature


Menu


Close popup

Please enter the verification code sent to your email: