Lidl & Waitrose warn Sainsbury’s-Asda merger will “impact outcomes for consumers”

Grocery

Rival supermarkets have warned that the Sainsbury’s–Asda merger could lead to a price hike and “impact outcomes for consumers”.

According to documents published by the CMA, which is currently carrying out its probe into the proposed merger, both Lidl and Waitrose have raised concerns about the probability of rising prices for consumers.

Lidl told the competition authority that the newly-formed entity would “have the capacity to increase prices” on products that do not compete directly on price with the discounters.

Meanwhile, Waitrose warned that the deal could “lead to a homogenous market, in which customers will be offered a reduced range and, ultimately, an increase in prices”.

It added that the increased buying power of the new group, which is predicted to have revenues of £51 billion a year, would effect competition and impact both consumers and suppliers.

As part of its probe, the CMA will seek views from interested parties like rival supermarkets and suppliers and publish submissions as it receives them.

When it was first announced at the end of April, Sainsbury’s boss Mike Coupe said the merger would lead to £500 million in cost savings and further investment to lower prices by around 10 per cent on everyday items.

Last week, it was revealed that the National Farmers Union raised similar concerns about the merger, warning that the £12 billion deal could reduce the choice and innovation of products while increase the squeeze on farmers.

Click here to sign up to Retail Gazette‘s free daily email newsletter

Grocery

17 Comments. Leave new

  • Joe Public 7 years ago

    I feel for the farmers who would be screwed down on their prices.
    Also, when all the other big 4 are increasing their prices, their leaves a gap in the market for Lidl and other suppliers to undercut the big four.
    Since Asda stopped their price guarantee, our weekly shop prices have increased.
    We shop more at Lidl already.

    Reply
  • Maureen 7 years ago

    I have already weeks ago, noticed Asda prices have gone up, Since then I haven’t visited the store anymore,
    They could all drop their prices more than they do at present,

    Reply
  • N 7 years ago

    Bit rich Waitrose saying prices would go up, they are way more expensive than the other main supermarkets already!!

    Reply
    • A 7 years ago

      Have you tasted Waitrose food? Its like comparing sainsburys basics to sainsburys taste the difference saying its the same thing but different pricing

      Reply
      • Jo 7 years ago

        Mainstream brands are much pricier in Waitrose

        Reply
  • Mike 7 years ago

    What worries me is that Sainsburys food quality would be reduced to the poor standards of Asda’s.

    Reply
    • Jue 7 years ago

      Asda’s quality went downhill as soon as Wallmart got involved. Please leave Sainsburys alone!

      Reply
      • Ant1032974 7 years ago

        I found the same happened when Morrisons took over Safeway.

        Reply
  • Glen 7 years ago

    It added that the increased buying power of the new group, which is predicted to have revenues of £51 billion a year, would effect competition.

    Surely it would affect competition not effect!!

    Reply
    • Nick 7 years ago

      Maybe affect and effect should form a merger to reduce confusion and grammatical errors

      Reply
      • Oliver 7 years ago
        Reply
  • Ben Daly 7 years ago

    What I worry about is someone owning a monopoly of supermarkets and online retailers Or catalogue retailer or generally owning a monopoly of places of where consumers purchase things from

    Reply
  • Iain 7 years ago

    Interesting that the competitors are complaining that prices would go up. But that would surely make those competitors more competitive vs JS-Asda than now? Which would be good for them. So why are they objecting? Methinks they protesteth too much…

    Reply
  • S 7 years ago

    You get what you pay for.
    There is no comparison between ASDA and Waitrose!
    Fresh produce at Waitrose is actually fresh.

    Reply
  • Will 7 years ago

    Lidl and Aldi WILL be the alternative supermarkets ,I have already started to use these markets and the quality is every bit as good although the choice of goods is a little less

    Reply
  • Supermarket colleague 7 years ago

    I see comments like this everywhere but what people donot seem to realise is this merger is basically sainsburys and asda merging and making walmarts part on the board nothing more than a financial beneficiary this is probably one of the best things the companys can do to get the American people out of brittish companies!

    Reply
  • Charles Fleming 7 years ago

    So many people are going to lose their jobs with this merger. There is no need for two head offices and there will be force store sell offs to companies with zero experience who will end up in administration or to Wholefoods (Amazon owned) who will downsize the huge stores.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.

Grocery

Share:

Lidl & Waitrose warn Sainsbury’s-Asda merger will “impact outcomes for consumers”

Social


SUBSCRIBE TO OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Rival supermarkets have warned that the Sainsbury’s–Asda merger could lead to a price hike and “impact outcomes for consumers”.

According to documents published by the CMA, which is currently carrying out its probe into the proposed merger, both Lidl and Waitrose have raised concerns about the probability of rising prices for consumers.

Lidl told the competition authority that the newly-formed entity would “have the capacity to increase prices” on products that do not compete directly on price with the discounters.

Meanwhile, Waitrose warned that the deal could “lead to a homogenous market, in which customers will be offered a reduced range and, ultimately, an increase in prices”.

It added that the increased buying power of the new group, which is predicted to have revenues of £51 billion a year, would effect competition and impact both consumers and suppliers.

As part of its probe, the CMA will seek views from interested parties like rival supermarkets and suppliers and publish submissions as it receives them.

When it was first announced at the end of April, Sainsbury’s boss Mike Coupe said the merger would lead to £500 million in cost savings and further investment to lower prices by around 10 per cent on everyday items.

Last week, it was revealed that the National Farmers Union raised similar concerns about the merger, warning that the £12 billion deal could reduce the choice and innovation of products while increase the squeeze on farmers.

Click here to sign up to Retail Gazette‘s free daily email newsletter

Grocery

17 Comments. Leave new

  • Joe Public 7 years ago

    I feel for the farmers who would be screwed down on their prices.
    Also, when all the other big 4 are increasing their prices, their leaves a gap in the market for Lidl and other suppliers to undercut the big four.
    Since Asda stopped their price guarantee, our weekly shop prices have increased.
    We shop more at Lidl already.

    Reply
  • Maureen 7 years ago

    I have already weeks ago, noticed Asda prices have gone up, Since then I haven’t visited the store anymore,
    They could all drop their prices more than they do at present,

    Reply
  • N 7 years ago

    Bit rich Waitrose saying prices would go up, they are way more expensive than the other main supermarkets already!!

    Reply
    • A 7 years ago

      Have you tasted Waitrose food? Its like comparing sainsburys basics to sainsburys taste the difference saying its the same thing but different pricing

      Reply
      • Jo 7 years ago

        Mainstream brands are much pricier in Waitrose

        Reply
  • Mike 7 years ago

    What worries me is that Sainsburys food quality would be reduced to the poor standards of Asda’s.

    Reply
    • Jue 7 years ago

      Asda’s quality went downhill as soon as Wallmart got involved. Please leave Sainsburys alone!

      Reply
      • Ant1032974 7 years ago

        I found the same happened when Morrisons took over Safeway.

        Reply
  • Glen 7 years ago

    It added that the increased buying power of the new group, which is predicted to have revenues of £51 billion a year, would effect competition.

    Surely it would affect competition not effect!!

    Reply
    • Nick 7 years ago

      Maybe affect and effect should form a merger to reduce confusion and grammatical errors

      Reply
      • Oliver 7 years ago
        Reply
  • Ben Daly 7 years ago

    What I worry about is someone owning a monopoly of supermarkets and online retailers Or catalogue retailer or generally owning a monopoly of places of where consumers purchase things from

    Reply
  • Iain 7 years ago

    Interesting that the competitors are complaining that prices would go up. But that would surely make those competitors more competitive vs JS-Asda than now? Which would be good for them. So why are they objecting? Methinks they protesteth too much…

    Reply
  • S 7 years ago

    You get what you pay for.
    There is no comparison between ASDA and Waitrose!
    Fresh produce at Waitrose is actually fresh.

    Reply
  • Will 7 years ago

    Lidl and Aldi WILL be the alternative supermarkets ,I have already started to use these markets and the quality is every bit as good although the choice of goods is a little less

    Reply
  • Supermarket colleague 7 years ago

    I see comments like this everywhere but what people donot seem to realise is this merger is basically sainsburys and asda merging and making walmarts part on the board nothing more than a financial beneficiary this is probably one of the best things the companys can do to get the American people out of brittish companies!

    Reply
  • Charles Fleming 7 years ago

    So many people are going to lose their jobs with this merger. There is no need for two head offices and there will be force store sell offs to companies with zero experience who will end up in administration or to Wholefoods (Amazon owned) who will downsize the huge stores.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.

RELATED STORIES

Latest Feature


Menu


Close popup

Please enter the verification code sent to your email: