EY, KPMG and PwC all refuse Sports Direct auditor role

Sport and Leisure

Three of the ‘big four’ accounting firms have declined to take on an audit of Sports Direct International.

According to a report by Sky News, EY, KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC) have all taken themselves out of the running because of potential conflicts of interest and concerns over reputation.

Owner Mike Ashley will now have to find an alternative auditor to replace accountancy firm Grant Thornton.

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) is currently conducting an investigation into Grant Thornton’s audits of Mike Ashley’s Sports Direct for the financial year ending April 2016.

The FRC is investigating the accountancy firm after is signed off an arrangement between Mike Ashley and his brother John Ashley’s company Barlin Delivery.

Of the big four, KPMG is thought to have refused the role due to the fact it audits Sports Direct’s rival JD Sports Fashion.

EY recently acted as administrator to House of Fraser and turned down the role due to potential accusations of conflict of interest.

Meanwhile Sky News reported that Deloitte and PwC are believed to have concerns about the reputational risk of auditing Sports Direct.

Click here to sign up to Retail Gazette‘s free daily email newsletter

Sport and Leisure

3 Comments. Leave new

  • Roger Mautner 8 years ago

    I was AMUSED that the 3 (three) biggest ‘Crook’ Accountants (Remember the ‘debacle’ over Tescos’ accounts, Carillion, etc.,etc. etc., are REFUSING to DEAL with brilliant and charismatic business man Mike Ashley. How ironic is this World?

    Reply
  • MICHAEL RYAN 8 years ago

    Couldn’t have put it better myself ha ha

    Reply
  • Geoffrey Earnshaw 8 years ago

    If they did their job properly, and supervised every stage of the audit they would have nothing to worry about from a reputational point of view, are they indicating that this is beyond their capability?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.

Sport and Leisure

Share:

EY, KPMG and PwC all refuse Sports Direct auditor role

Three of the ‘big four’ accounting firms have declined to take on an audit of Sports Direct International.

According to a report by Sky News, EY, KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC) have all taken themselves out of the running because of potential conflicts of interest and concerns over reputation.

Owner Mike Ashley will now have to find an alternative auditor to replace accountancy firm Grant Thornton.

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) is currently conducting an investigation into Grant Thornton’s audits of Mike Ashley’s Sports Direct for the financial year ending April 2016.

The FRC is investigating the accountancy firm after is signed off an arrangement between Mike Ashley and his brother John Ashley’s company Barlin Delivery.

Of the big four, KPMG is thought to have refused the role due to the fact it audits Sports Direct’s rival JD Sports Fashion.

EY recently acted as administrator to House of Fraser and turned down the role due to potential accusations of conflict of interest.

Meanwhile Sky News reported that Deloitte and PwC are believed to have concerns about the reputational risk of auditing Sports Direct.

Click here to sign up to Retail Gazette‘s free daily email newsletter

Social


SUBSCRIBE TO OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Sport and Leisure

3 Comments. Leave new

  • Roger Mautner 8 years ago

    I was AMUSED that the 3 (three) biggest ‘Crook’ Accountants (Remember the ‘debacle’ over Tescos’ accounts, Carillion, etc.,etc. etc., are REFUSING to DEAL with brilliant and charismatic business man Mike Ashley. How ironic is this World?

    Reply
  • MICHAEL RYAN 8 years ago

    Couldn’t have put it better myself ha ha

    Reply
  • Geoffrey Earnshaw 8 years ago

    If they did their job properly, and supervised every stage of the audit they would have nothing to worry about from a reputational point of view, are they indicating that this is beyond their capability?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.

RELATED STORIES

Latest Feature


Menu


Close popup

Please enter the verification code sent to your email: