M&S Marble Arch store to be demolished as Sadiq Khan opts not to intervene

M&S
Department StoresProperty
// The demolishment of M&S Marble Arch store on Oxford Street is set to go ahead after London mayor Sadiq Khan decided not to intervene
// Khan had revisited M&S’ application in light of criticism of the demolition, however, he decided that the carbon footprint of the construction had been considered from the outset

The demolition of the Marks & Spencer flagship at Marble Arch on Oxford Street can go ahead despite environmental concerns, London mayor Sadiq Khan has decided.

M&S is vying to replace the Edwardian art deco building, which is around 100 years old, with a 10-storey building, with offices, a gym and a smaller store.

Khan looked poised to stage an intervention last week when he opted to review the application after the Greater London Authority’s carbon advisor, architect Simon Sturgis, penned a report that said the demolition was at odds with City Hall’s planning policy of retaining and retro-fitting old buildings.

However, Khan has decided that the “carbon footprint” of demolishing the M&S store has been considered from an early stage and has referred the application back to Westminister council for final approval, according to the Evening Standard.

A spokeswoman for Khan said: “The mayor can only intervene in council planning decisions where the proposed scheme does not conform with the London Plan.

“After a thorough assessment of this proposal, including the total carbon footprint involved, it was determined that grounds did not exist to allow the mayor to intervene. It will therefore remain with Westminster City Council to determine the application.”

Westminster has already resolved to grant planning permission, subject to agreeing wider community benefits with the developers.


READ MORE:  First look: Next brings Gap back to UK high street as Oxford Street concession


Sturgis had argued that a comprehensive refurbishment was a better option than demolition. He tweeted over the weekend: “I never thought that a Labour mayor of London would prove to be less progressive on climate change than a Conservative government.

Sturgis added that M&S should withdraw the scheme to “demonstrate their sincerity” to Plan A, the firm’s sustainability masterplan.

An M&S spokesman said: “We are continuing to make progress on our plans to invest in the west end of Oxford Street for the long term by establishing a new, vibrant M&S store fit for modern retail, along with best in class sustainable office space.

“We will keep the local community updated as our plans progress.”

Click here to sign up to Retail Gazette‘s free daily email newsletter

Department StoresProperty

4 Comments. Leave new

  • Chris Harding 4 years ago

    Of course he did… No surprise. Very sad.

    Reply
  • Anthony smith 4 years ago

    There surely has to be a way to allow m&s to redevelop while making sure there is affordable housing & accommodation for all. City centres all seem to be filling up with offices & gyms

    Reply
  • Anthony smith 4 years ago

    Considering that London has a great deal of people on the streets & in unsafe accommodation, surely they could redevelope with a smaller store & accomodation for everyone

    Reply
  • J Richards 4 years ago

    Shame on Sadiq Khan for not ensuring that the London Plan provides more protection and support for architectural aesthetics and town/city centre urban design. Beautiful and interesting architecture is essential to the attraction of a locality, a town centre; it gives local centres their character, makes them much more attractive to live in and to tourists. Pre-art deco, and Art Deco, are hugely undervalued by developers, property owners, urban designers, planning consultants and decision-makers. This iconic Oxford Street building should be saved. With a bit more will, surely there is a way to refurbish and even partly rebuild while making the resulting building more sustainable. The proposed new building is not a patch on the current one, aesthetically.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.

M&S Marble Arch store to be demolished as Sadiq Khan opts not to intervene

M&S

Social


SUBSCRIBE TO OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
// The demolishment of M&S Marble Arch store on Oxford Street is set to go ahead after London mayor Sadiq Khan decided not to intervene
// Khan had revisited M&S’ application in light of criticism of the demolition, however, he decided that the carbon footprint of the construction had been considered from the outset

The demolition of the Marks & Spencer flagship at Marble Arch on Oxford Street can go ahead despite environmental concerns, London mayor Sadiq Khan has decided.

M&S is vying to replace the Edwardian art deco building, which is around 100 years old, with a 10-storey building, with offices, a gym and a smaller store.

Khan looked poised to stage an intervention last week when he opted to review the application after the Greater London Authority’s carbon advisor, architect Simon Sturgis, penned a report that said the demolition was at odds with City Hall’s planning policy of retaining and retro-fitting old buildings.

However, Khan has decided that the “carbon footprint” of demolishing the M&S store has been considered from an early stage and has referred the application back to Westminister council for final approval, according to the Evening Standard.

A spokeswoman for Khan said: “The mayor can only intervene in council planning decisions where the proposed scheme does not conform with the London Plan.

“After a thorough assessment of this proposal, including the total carbon footprint involved, it was determined that grounds did not exist to allow the mayor to intervene. It will therefore remain with Westminster City Council to determine the application.”

Westminster has already resolved to grant planning permission, subject to agreeing wider community benefits with the developers.


READ MORE:  First look: Next brings Gap back to UK high street as Oxford Street concession


Sturgis had argued that a comprehensive refurbishment was a better option than demolition. He tweeted over the weekend: “I never thought that a Labour mayor of London would prove to be less progressive on climate change than a Conservative government.

Sturgis added that M&S should withdraw the scheme to “demonstrate their sincerity” to Plan A, the firm’s sustainability masterplan.

An M&S spokesman said: “We are continuing to make progress on our plans to invest in the west end of Oxford Street for the long term by establishing a new, vibrant M&S store fit for modern retail, along with best in class sustainable office space.

“We will keep the local community updated as our plans progress.”

Click here to sign up to Retail Gazette‘s free daily email newsletter

Department StoresProperty

4 Comments. Leave new

  • Chris Harding 4 years ago

    Of course he did… No surprise. Very sad.

    Reply
  • Anthony smith 4 years ago

    There surely has to be a way to allow m&s to redevelop while making sure there is affordable housing & accommodation for all. City centres all seem to be filling up with offices & gyms

    Reply
  • Anthony smith 4 years ago

    Considering that London has a great deal of people on the streets & in unsafe accommodation, surely they could redevelope with a smaller store & accomodation for everyone

    Reply
  • J Richards 4 years ago

    Shame on Sadiq Khan for not ensuring that the London Plan provides more protection and support for architectural aesthetics and town/city centre urban design. Beautiful and interesting architecture is essential to the attraction of a locality, a town centre; it gives local centres their character, makes them much more attractive to live in and to tourists. Pre-art deco, and Art Deco, are hugely undervalued by developers, property owners, urban designers, planning consultants and decision-makers. This iconic Oxford Street building should be saved. With a bit more will, surely there is a way to refurbish and even partly rebuild while making the resulting building more sustainable. The proposed new building is not a patch on the current one, aesthetically.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.

RELATED STORIES

Latest Feature


Menu


Close popup

Please enter the verification code sent to your email: