Boohoo, Nike and H&M deny Uighur forced labour in supply chains

664
Boohoo, Nike and H&M deny Uighur forced labour in supply chains
Boohoo responsible sourcing director Andrew Reaney told MPs at the BEIS select committee that the online retailer was “shocked” by reports regarding the forced labour of Uighur Muslims.
// Boohoo, H&M, Nike & VF Corp brought before MPs at the BEIS committee to address concerns around Uighur slave labour
// They all denied the use of suppliers or manufacturing in the Xinjiang region of China

Boohoo, H&M and Nike have denied the use of suppliers or manufacturing in the Xinjiang region of China as they expressed “shock” surrounding allegations regarding the forced labour of Uighur Muslims.

The retailers, which also included North Face and Vans parent company VF Corp, were brought before MPs at the Business, Energy and Industry Strategy (BEIS) committee to address reports that products involving Uighur slave labour could be sold to UK consumers.

Boohoo responsible sourcing director Andrew Reaney told MPs at the BEIS select committee that the online retailer was “shocked” by reports regarding the forced labour of Uighur Muslims.


READ MORE: 


“We were quite shocked by the revelations around the Uighurs and what’s happening in the Xinjiang province,” he said.

“We wrote to all our suppliers across the supply chain to confirm that we have no manufacturing or fabric links to that particular region.

“That was done and all of our suppliers confirmed that they have no manufacturing or fabric links to that region.”

Reaney stressed that the online retailer does “not knowingly source any yarn or fabric” from the region, as MPs questioned auditing processes at the business following a recent row over working conditions in its UK supply chain.

Last month, Boohoo published its full report by Alison Levitt QC, which identified “many failings” but freed it from allegations of deliberately allowing poor conditions and low pay for garment workers.

“It’s a matter of regret from the organisation that we obviously didn’t move as fast as we could have,” Reaney said.

“The purpose of being here today and the Levitt report is to demonstrate our sincerity and commitment to absolute 100 per cent supply chain transparency, irrespective of the source and region, whether its Leicester or whether its China.”

H&M head of supply chain David Savman said the Swedish-based retail group worked with accreditation groups for its supply chain which no longer use cotton from the region following the allegations.

“When these serious allegations came up we made investigations into all of our suppliers,” he told MPs.

“We didn’t find any proof of any breach of our sustainability commitments, where we have very clear guidance of how our ethical processes should happen.”

Later in the committee session, Jaycee Pribulsky, vice president of global footwear sourcing and manufacturing at Nike, said the sportswear giant was “deeply concerned” regarding the situation in the Chinese region.

“Nike does not source any raw cotton,” she told MPs.

“And regarding Xinjiang, Nike has confirmed with its suppliers that there are no spun yarns or textiles manufactured in the area in our products.”

with PA Wires

Click here to sign up to Retail Gazette’s free daily email newsletter

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here